Nursing Home Sepsis Lawyer in Columbia
When a Serious Infection Raises Questions About Nursing Home Care
Sepsis is a medical emergency. For a nursing home resident, it can develop after an infection in the lungs, urinary tract, skin, gastrointestinal tract, or another part of the body becomes severe enough to trigger a life-threatening response.
A sepsis diagnosis does not automatically mean that a nursing home was negligent. Older adults and people with chronic medical conditions are already at increased risk. But when warning signs were documented and not addressed, an infection was not monitored appropriately, necessary care was delayed, or a resident's condition deteriorated without timely clinical escalation, the circumstances may warrant investigation.
At Smith Born Leventis Taylor & Vega, LLC, our Columbia nursing home abuse and neglect attorneys represent residents and families who need answers about whether failures in care contributed to serious injury or death.
Call us at or contact us online to get started. There’s no cost and no obligation.
What Sepsis Is and Why Nursing Home Residents Face Higher Risk
Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the body's dysregulated response to an infection.
It is different from an uncomplicated infection. Once sepsis develops, organs and tissues can be injured as the body's response to infection becomes abnormal and widespread. Septic shock is a particularly severe subset of sepsis involving profound circulatory and metabolic abnormalities.
Nursing home residents can be especially vulnerable because advanced age, chronic illness, weakened immune function, recent hospitalization, wounds, and medical devices may increase infection risk.
Infections that can lead to sepsis commonly begin in the lungs, urinary tract, skin, or gastrointestinal tract. In nursing homes, that means a case may involve pneumonia, a urinary infection, an infected wound or pressure ulcer, or another infection that became more serious.
Appropriate infection-control practices, resident monitoring, and timely clinical response can reduce risk and help identify some infections before they progress. They cannot prevent every infection or every case of sepsis.
Signs of Deterioration That May Require Prompt Evaluation
Sepsis can be difficult to recognize, particularly in older adults whose symptoms may not look the same as they would in a younger patient.
Changes that may warrant prompt clinical evaluation include:
- New or worsening confusion or disorientation
- Fever, chills, or feeling unusually cold
- Shortness of breath or rapid breathing
- High heart rate or weak pulse
- Low blood pressure
- Extreme pain or discomfort
- Clammy or sweaty skin
- Visible signs that an existing infection or wound is worsening
A nursing home resident may also show a meaningful change from their normal baseline before the cause is clear.
Federal nursing-home rules require facilities to consult with the resident's physician when there is a significant deterioration in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. The circumstances of that notification, what information staff communicated, and what happened afterward can become important evidence in a sepsis case.
Infection Control and Staffing Duties in Nursing Homes
Federal regulations require nursing facilities to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent, identify, report, investigate, and control infections.
That program must include infection surveillance, written policies and procedures, antibiotic stewardship, documentation of identified infection incidents and corrective actions, and a qualified infection preventionist.
Federal rules also require nursing homes to maintain sufficient nursing staff with the competencies and skills necessary to meet residents' assessed needs.
South Carolina nursing homes are licensed by the Department of Public Health under Regulation 60-17, Standards for Licensing Nursing Homes.
Those regulations do not mean that every infection or sepsis diagnosis creates liability. The legal question is whether the facility failed to provide care required under the circumstances and whether that failure caused or worsened the resident's injuries.
For broader information about infection-related neglect, our Columbia nursing home infection page addresses prevention and other infections that can affect long-term care residents.
When Sepsis May Point to Nursing Home Neglect
A sepsis claim requires more than identifying the infection after the fact.
The investigation usually focuses on what staff knew, what they observed, how the resident's condition changed, what action was taken, and whether delays contributed to the outcome.
Depending on the case, potentially important issues can include:
- A wound or pressure ulcer that showed signs of infection without appropriate follow-up
- Changes in vital signs or mental status that were documented but not escalated
- Delays in contacting a physician or other qualified provider
- Failure to carry out ordered testing or treatment
- Delayed transfer to an emergency department or hospital after significant deterioration
- Problems with catheter, wound, or other infection-related care
- Staffing or communication problems that affected resident monitoring
None of those facts establishes negligence by itself. They become meaningful when the records show that the care provided fell below the applicable standard and that the lapse contributed to the sepsis-related injury.
Reconstructing the Timeline Is Often Central to the Case
Nursing home sepsis cases are heavily dependent on documentation.
A resident may have been unable to describe symptoms clearly, family members may not have been present when the condition changed, and multiple nurses, aides, physicians, or outside providers may have participated in the care.
The evidence can include:
- Nursing notes
- Vital-sign records
- Medication administration records
- Physician and provider orders
- Wound-care documentation
- Laboratory and culture results
- Catheter records
- Antibiotic records
- Hospital-transfer documentation
- Communications with physicians and family
- Staffing information
- Facility infection-control records
The timeline between the first documented signs of infection or deterioration and the facility's clinical response can be an important part of the causation analysis.
It can show when the resident's condition changed, who was notified, what was ordered, whether treatment occurred, and when a higher level of care was requested.
Medical expert review may also be necessary to determine whether an earlier intervention probably would have changed the outcome.
Call Smith Born Leventis Taylor & Vega, LLC at to schedule your free consultation with a nursing home sepsis lawyer in Columbia, SC.
Our Satisfied Clients
-
“Being involved in a life-changing event is when you realize that we are really not in control of our lives and how we choose to handle it is where we find our character. Thank God for my legal team, Jacob and Erica, and everyone else involved.”- Former Client
-
“George kept me informed and gave loving advice all the way through. I could call him when I needed. He recognized my personal, mental and physical struggles. You can trust in him. GOD knew EXACTLY what he was doing when he made him.”- Former Client
-
“He was patient, listened, considerate, explained things to me that my previous attorney did not, and broke every part of my case down so I was sure to understand every aspect of my case before leaving his office.”- Cassandra J.
-
“Promises were kept and interactions were both personal and professional. I would highly recommend Mr. George and his firm to anyone in need of legal help.”- Former Client
-
“I had a workers compensation claim that my wonderful lawyer Lawton Harper was able to help me with. He was very attentive to detail and was able to get me the maximum claim I deserved!”- Former Client
-
“When my case took a hit from the doctor’s final impairment rating, Danny didn’t give up – he went full force and earned me a fair settlement!”- Former Client
-
“Lawton Harper has been amazing helping me with my works compensation case. He explained everything about what to expect throughout the case and was there for any questions or concerns I had.”- Kai P.
-
“He was very attentive to detail and was able to get me the maximum claim I deserved!”- Former Client